ProjectPhD

How It Works

From trigger to governance record in 48 hours.

Step 1
Trigger identified
  • Stage-gate funding release
  • Board or audit committee request
  • Leadership change
  • Vendor dispute
  • Benefits skepticism
Step 2
Respondents invited
  • Sponsor + PM mandatory
  • Additional respondents optional (CIO, PMO, operational)
  • Signed attestation captured
  • Alignment recorded across roles
Step 3
Snapshot
FREE · In minutes
  • Risk rating + confidence
  • Benchmark percentile
  • Preliminary signals
  • Designed for forwarding
Step 4
Board Assurance Report
48 hours
  • Benchmark vs matched peer cohort
  • Alignment Index
  • Top 5 risk drivers
  • Benefits-at-risk
  • 90-day action plan
  • Conditions-to-proceed
  • Governance Decision Memo

ALIGNMENT INDEX

The signal that pierces filtered reporting.

Alignment Index
Governance & Sponsorship
HIGH
Scope & Requirements
LOW ★
Vendor Performance
MEDIUM
Plan & Schedule
LOW ★
Business Case & Benefits
HIGH
Change & Communications
MEDIUM

★ Divergence signal

The delivery team rates scope as defined. The sponsor rates it as still evolving. That divergence is documented as a governance signal — not a performance finding. Attributed to roles, not individuals. Objective. Defensible.

The Alignment Index surfaces where stakeholder views diverge on delivery reality. It directly addresses the principal-agent problem — the people spending the budget are the same people reporting on it — by corroborating perspectives across roles. Where respondents agree, there is confidence. Where they diverge, there is a governance signal that requires attention.

GOVERNANCE DECISION MEMO

The governance record at the point of funding release.

One-page Governance Decision Memo
Recommended: Step-up discipline · Confidence: Medium · Conditions-to-proceed: 6 · Methodology: v1.2
Proceed
Normal governance cadence
Step-up + Re-Check
90-day action plan. Conditions verified at 90 days. from $999
Commission Full Assurance
or Assurance Panel RFP Pack if panel restrictions apply

The Governance Decision Memo is designed for board papers. It records the recommended action, confidence basis, methodology version, and conditions in a single artefact. It is your documented due diligence.

WHAT THE REPORT COVERS

All contributing factors — not just technology execution.

The diagnostic assesses delivery risk across all contributing factors — not just technology execution. Business readiness, sponsorship quality, resourcing, vendor performance, and organisational preparedness to adopt the outcome are assessed alongside delivery controls.

Default
Board View
8 dimensions

  • Governance & Sponsorship
  • Business Case & Benefits
  • Project Leadership
  • Scope & Requirements
  • RAID & Dependencies
  • Vendor Performance
  • Plan & Schedule
  • Change & Communications
Optional
Delivery View
All 16 dimensions

  • All Board View dimensions, plus:
  • Cost Tracking
  • PM Processes
  • Resources & Teamwork
  • Solution & Architecture
  • Development
  • Testing
  • Implementation Planning
  • Post-Implementation Planning

Business readiness and adoption risk are assessed within the Change & Communications and Business Case & Benefits dimensions — recognising that programs which deliver technical outputs but fail to achieve business outcomes represent a systemic failure pattern.

Request a Board Assurance Report

A short conversation to scope the diagnostic to your program and confirm fit. Board Assurance Reports are delivered within 48 hours of respondent completion.

Subscribe to insights

Receive ongoing research findings from the ProjectPhD diagnostic dataset. No sales content. Unsubscribe at any time.

Thank you. You have been subscribed.

Book a call

We will be in touch within one working day to arrange a convenient time.

Thank you. We will be in touch shortly.